🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Tuesday, 4 March 2003

Points of Order — Allocation of Questions

HansardID: d24278ee-a7e0-465a-93c0-43538c6620ac
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech Hon Gerry Brownlee (New Zealand National Party — Member for Ilam)
Time unknown

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I raise an issue, understanding—as all parties do—that the allocation of questions is done according to a formula. I want to point out that today we have to go to question No. 6 before the major Opposition party has a question. Prior to that, we have three questions asked of the Government, by the Government. I make it clear that question time is for the Opposition parties to question Government Ministers, and, if we have a formula being applied in this case that will mean the major Opposition party does not come into play until halfway through the day, then, clearly, we need to have a new formula.

🗣️ Speech Mr SPEAKER
Time unknown

I have in front of me the schedule given to me by the Clerk. I will have a look at it. The allocation of questions is done to an agreed formula, and I understand that it is done very carefully. It has been rolled over for months.

🗣️ Speech Richard Prebble (ACT New Zealand — List Member)
Time unknown

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I think I can help the honourable member. If he actually goes and looks at the questions for oral answer for today, he will see that in question No. 2 the effective Opposition does ask a question.

💬 Mr SPEAKER: No, that is being silly.

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (2)