πŸ§ͺ EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA β€” this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

πŸ—³οΈ Votes

Tuesday, 18 May 2004
Corrections Bill
18 May 2004 Β· Part 3 Transitional provisions Β· Party vote
That the amendment be agreed to
Aye: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future β€” No: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive
βœ• Failed
56 Aye – 61 No
2 absent
18 May 2004 Β· Part 3 Transitional provisions Β· Party vote
That the amendment be agreed to
Aye: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future β€” No: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive
βœ• Failed
56 Aye – 61 No
2 absent
18 May 2004 Β· Part 3 Transitional provisions Β· Party vote
The amendment be agreed to
Aye: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future β€” No: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive
βœ• Failed
56 Aye – 61 No
2 absent
18 May 2004 Β· Part 3 Transitional provisions Β· Party vote
That the amendment be agreed to
Aye: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future β€” No: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive
βœ• Failed
56 Aye – 61 No
2 absent
18 May 2004 Β· Part 3 Transitional provisions Β· Party vote
That the amendments be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
61 Aye – 56 No
2 absent
18 May 2004 Β· Part 3 Transitional provisions Β· Party vote
That Part 3 as amended be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
61 Aye – 56 No
2 absent
18 May 2004 Β· Procedure Β· Party vote
That the report be adopted
Aye: ACT New Zealand, Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
69 Aye – 48 No
2 absent
Wednesday, 12 May 2004
Judicial Matters Bill
12 May 2004 Β· Instruction to Committee Β· Party vote
That the motion be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
71 Aye – 47 No
2 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Part 1 Judicial Conduct Commissioner and Judicial Conduct Panel Β· Party vote
That the question be now put
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 55 No
2 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Part 1 Judicial Conduct Commissioner and Judicial Conduct Panel Β· Party vote
That the amendments be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 55 No
2 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Part 1 Judicial Conduct Commissioner and Judicial Conduct Panel Β· Party vote
That Part 1 as amended be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 55 No
2 absent
12 May 2004 Β· I gave two examples the other day, both of which I think bear repeating because they reflect the reality of life in the courts. The reality of life in the courts is that because there is a requirement to schedule cases, counsel are asked to make estimates of how long a case will last. Now, if we are to deal with what the Government apparently contemplates, which is a part-time judge or judges, we will find there will be occasions when such a part-time judge is simply unable to sit on all days of the week. So a 4-day case is ruled out for the part-time judge, and a 3-day case may also be ruled out. Those who have knowledge of the criminal and civil courts, in particular, will know that many cases run for those sorts of periods. What is the outcome? It is that the burden will be transferred on to the full-time judges in a way that is neither fair nor equitable. But that comment applies in the circumstance of scheduling where an accurate estimate is made of how long a case will last. It is often the caseβ€”and I instanced this to members the other dayβ€”that a case trickles on. It not only runs a day over the estimated time, but it may run 2 days over. In fact, there have been instances in recent times where the hearing duration of significant commercial cases has been hugely underestimated. So there will be the situation where a case runs on, and the part-time judge says he or she cannot continue to sit on the case. Β· Party vote
That the amendments be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 55 No
2 absent
12 May 2004 Β· I gave two examples the other day, both of which I think bear repeating because they reflect the reality of life in the courts. The reality of life in the courts is that because there is a requirement to schedule cases, counsel are asked to make estimates of how long a case will last. Now, if we are to deal with what the Government apparently contemplates, which is a part-time judge or judges, we will find there will be occasions when such a part-time judge is simply unable to sit on all days of the week. So a 4-day case is ruled out for the part-time judge, and a 3-day case may also be ruled out. Those who have knowledge of the criminal and civil courts, in particular, will know that many cases run for those sorts of periods. What is the outcome? It is that the burden will be transferred on to the full-time judges in a way that is neither fair nor equitable. But that comment applies in the circumstance of scheduling where an accurate estimate is made of how long a case will last. It is often the caseβ€”and I instanced this to members the other dayβ€”that a case trickles on. It not only runs a day over the estimated time, but it may run 2 days over. In fact, there have been instances in recent times where the hearing duration of significant commercial cases has been hugely underestimated. So there will be the situation where a case runs on, and the part-time judge says he or she cannot continue to sit on the case. Β· Party vote
That Part 2 as amended be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 55 No
2 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Schedule 1AA Overview of process for Judicial Conduct Commissioner and Judicial Conduct Panel Β· Party vote
That schedule 1AA be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 55 No
2 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Schedule 1 Provisions relating to Judicial Conduct Commissioner and members of Judicial Conduct Panel Β· Party vote
That the amendment be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 55 No
2 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Schedule 1 Provisions relating to Judicial Conduct Commissioner and members of Judicial Conduct Panel Β· Party vote
That schedule 1 as amended be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 55 No
2 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Schedule 2 Amendments consequential upon change of title of Master of the High Court Β· Party vote
That the amendment be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 55 No
2 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Schedule 2 Amendments consequential upon change of title of Master of the High Court Β· Party vote
That schedule 2 as amended be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 55 No
2 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Clauses 1 and 2 Β· Party vote
That clause 1 be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 56 No
1 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Clauses 1 and 2 Β· Party vote
That clause 2 be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 56 No
1 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Clauses 1 and 2 Β· Party vote
That the motion be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 56 No
1 absent
12 May 2004 Β· Procedure Β· Party vote
That the report be adopted
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 56 No
1 absent
Tuesday, 4 May 2004
Criminal Records (Clean Slate) Bill
4 May 2004 Β· Instruction to Committee Β· Party vote
That the motion be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
71 Aye – 49 No
4 May 2004 Β· Part 1 Preliminary provisions Β· Party vote
That the question be now put
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 55 No
2 absent
4 May 2004 Β· Part 1 Preliminary provisions Β· Party vote
That the amendments be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 56 No
1 absent
4 May 2004 Β· Part 1 Preliminary provisions Β· Party vote
That Part 1 as amended be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 57 No
4 May 2004 Β· Part 2 Clean slate scheme Β· Party vote
That the question be now put
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 57 No
4 May 2004 Β· Part 2 Clean slate scheme Β· Party vote
That the amendment be agreed to
Aye: ACT New Zealand, United Future β€” No: Green Party, New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, New Zealand National, Progressive
βœ• Failed
17 Aye – 103 No
4 May 2004 Β· Part 2 Clean slate scheme Β· Party vote
That the amendment be agreed to
Aye: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future β€” No: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive
βœ• Failed
57 Aye – 63 No
4 May 2004 Β· Part 2 Clean slate scheme Β· Party vote
That the amendments be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 57 No
4 May 2004 Β· Part 2 Clean slate scheme Β· Party vote
That Part 2 as amended be agreed to.
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 57 No
4 May 2004 Β· Clause 1 Title Β· Party vote
That the amendment be agreed to
Aye: ACT New Zealand, United Future β€” No: Green Party, New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, New Zealand National, Progressive
βœ• Failed
16 Aye – 103 No
1 absent
4 May 2004 Β· Clause 1 Title Β· Party vote
That clause 1 be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 56 No
1 absent
4 May 2004 Β· Procedure Β· Party vote
That the report be adopted
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National, United Future
βœ“ Passed
63 Aye – 56 No
1 absent
Tuesday, 30 March 2004
Education (Disestablishment of Early Childhood Development Board) Amendment Bill
30 Mar 2004 Β· Second Reading Β· Party vote
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
84 Aye – 35 No
1 absent
30 Mar 2004 Β· Instruction to Committee Β· Party vote
That the bill be taken part by part
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
84 Aye – 35 No
1 absent
30 Mar 2004 Β· Part 1 Preliminary provisions Β· Party vote
That the question be now put
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
71 Aye – 48 No
1 absent
30 Mar 2004 Β· Part 1 Preliminary provisions Β· Party vote
That Part 1 be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
84 Aye – 35 No
1 absent
30 Mar 2004 Β· Part 2 Disestablishment of Board and associated matters Β· Party vote
That the question be now put
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
71 Aye – 48 No
1 absent
30 Mar 2004 Β· Part 2 Disestablishment of Board and associated matters Β· Party vote
That Part 2 be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
84 Aye – 35 No
1 absent
30 Mar 2004 Β· Clause 1 Title Β· Party vote
That clause 1 be agreed to
Aye: Green Party, New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
84 Aye – 35 No
1 absent
Tuesday, 30 March 2004
State Sector Amendment Bill (No 3)
30 Mar 2004 Β· Second Reading Β· Party vote
That the amendments recommended by the Education and Science Committee by majority be agreed to
Aye: New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, Green Party, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
75 Aye – 44 No
1 absent
30 Mar 2004 Β· Second Reading Β· Party vote
That the State Sector Amendment Bill (No 3) be read a second time
Aye: New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, Green Party, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
75 Aye – 44 No
1 absent
30 Mar 2004 Β· Part 1 Preliminary provisions Β· Party vote
That the question be now put
Aye: New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, Green Party, New Zealand First, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
62 Aye – 58 No
30 Mar 2004 Β· Part 1 Preliminary provisions Β· Party vote
That Part 1 be agreed to
Aye: New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, Green Party, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
75 Aye – 45 No
30 Mar 2004 Β· Part 2 Amendments concerning employees of Boards of Trustees. Β· Party vote
That the amendment be agreed to
Aye: ACT New Zealand, Green Party β€” No: New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, New Zealand National, Progressive, United Future
βœ• Failed
18 Aye – 102 No
30 Mar 2004 Β· Part 2 Amendments concerning employees of Boards of Trustees. Β· Party vote
That the amendment to the amendment be agreed to
Aye: New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, Green Party, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
75 Aye – 45 No
30 Mar 2004 Β· Part 2 Amendments concerning employees of Boards of Trustees. Β· Party vote
That the amendment as amended be agreed to
Aye: New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, Green Party, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
75 Aye – 45 No
30 Mar 2004 Β· Part 2 Amendments concerning employees of Boards of Trustees. Β· Party vote
that Part 2 as amended be agreed to
Aye: New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, Green Party, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
75 Aye – 45 No
30 Mar 2004 Β· Clause 1 Title Β· Party vote
That clause 1 be agreed to
Aye: New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, Green Party, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
75 Aye – 45 No
30 Mar 2004 Β· Third Reading Β· Party vote
Aye: New Zealand First, New Zealand Labour, Progressive, United Future β€” No: ACT New Zealand, Green Party, New Zealand National
βœ“ Passed
75 Aye – 44 No
1 absent
Tuesday, 30 March 2004
Radio New Zealand Amendment Bill
← Previous Page 158 of 170 Next β†’