Thursday, 30 October 2014
Vote: Address in Reply
🗳️ That the following words be added to the Address: “and expects, over the next 3 years, to see every child grow up in a warm, dry home; the number of affordable homes built increased; every New Zealander have access to affordable healthcare; wages for all rising faster than the cost of living; jobs created and unemployment back under 4 percent; exports increased as a percentage of GDP; the economy diversified towards value-added goods and services; economic and social inequality reduced; targets to measure and reduce child poverty; a cross-party approach to addressing domestic and sexual violence; real measures to target climate change and improve our sustainability; a plan for the recovery of Canterbury; and the Government to be guided in their work by the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi; because without these commitments and goals New Zealand will not grow or move forward to the future New Zealanders deserve.”
TIM MACINDOE (National—Hamilton West): There are just 8 minutes left of the 1,140 minutes allocated for this Address in Reply debate, and I have counted every one of them. The motion that was so ably moved by Chris Bishop and seconded by Barbara Kuriger... Read more →
✕ Failed by a narrow margin
(57 Ayes – 64 Noes)
Hansard didn't name individual MPs for this vote, only how each party voted overall, so
there's no per-member breakdown to show here.
🏛️ Party breakdown
| Party | Aye | No |
|---|---|---|
| ACT New Zealand | 0 | 1 |
| Green Party | 14 | 0 |
| Māori Party | 0 | 2 |
| New Zealand First | 11 | 0 |
| New Zealand Labour | 32 | 0 |
| New Zealand National | 0 | 60 |
| United Future | 0 | 1 |