🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Wednesday, 20 October 2004
Vote: Bills — Animal Welfare (Restriction on Docking of Dogs' Tails) Bill — First Reading

🗳️ That the Animal Welfare (Restriction on Docking of Dogs’ Tails) Bill be now read a first time

Moved by Dianne Yates (New Zealand Labour Party — Member for Hamilton East)

DIANNE YATES (Labour—Hamilton East): I thank the Veterinary Council of New Zealand for its long persistence, since 1999, in bringing forward this legislation. I inform Sandra Goudie that it has been written by a vet who understands the terms involved. I... Read more →

HansardID: e80db6a1-41b4-4197-8650-2cd9137fb034
📋 We've linked this vote to our “Restricting non-therapeutic tail docking of dogs” policy - our best judgment is that a vote for this is a vote for Restricting non-therapeutic tail docking of dogs.
✓ Passed by a clear majority (79 Ayes – 37 Noes – 4 Absent)
Hansard recorded how individual MPs from United Future New Zealand voted, but only a single party-wide total for everyone else. That pattern usually means United Future New Zealand allowed a conscience vote while the other parties whipped a single position.

🏛️ Party breakdown

Party Aye No
ACT New Zealand 0 8
Green Party 9 0
Māori Party 1 0
New Zealand First 13 0
New Zealand Labour 51 0
New Zealand National 0 24
Progressive 2 0

✓ Ayes (2)

United Future New Zealand (2)

✕ Noes (5)

United Future New Zealand (5)