πŸ§ͺ EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA β€” this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Thursday, 21 October 2004

Parental Leave and Employment ProtectionAmendment Bill

Second Reading
HansardID: d4fdd8cc-ee31-4d7e-9b7a-2fb3c94b1250
πŸ—³οΈ 2 votes β€” jump to votes section
Back to debates
πŸ—£οΈ Speech Peter Brown (New Zealand First Party β€” List Member)
Time unknown

New Zealand First is determined to make some amendments to this bill. My colleague Bill Gudgeon has a Supplementary Order Paper, which provides for self-employed women to receive paid parental leave. We say that it is totally unfair that this bill should apply only to employed people. I notice that United Future was sympathetic to that amendment, and I know that the Greens are sympathetic, but they say that it would take too long and could not be done in the time frame of this bill.

I asked Jeanette Fitzsimons afterwards, and she was quite genuine about it and said we need a definition of a self-employed person. Well, New Zealand First has fixed it! We have a definition. It took us all of 5 minutes, but we have got it. In the Committee stage we will put forward a Supplementary Order Paper, in my name, which defines a self-employed person. I take this opportunity to read it out: β€œFor the purposes of this Act a self-employed person is a person whose work routine and time frame are usually not controlled and who may hire others to do the work. They are seldom paid at a set rate, e.g. hourly, weekly or by units of production, and do not work set hours or a given number of hours each week or month. Those contracting them do not pay them sick pay, holiday pay, overtime or penal rates.” New Zealand First thinks that is a good definition. We know that it is acceptable, because the Inland Revenue Department operates to that definition of a self-employed person. As that department will pay out for this provision, we think it is only common sense that the same definition should apply to those who collect the money and to those who pay it out.

So I look forward to total support from the Greens, because this amendment is in response to Jeanette Fitzsimons’ comment, and to total support from United Future. United Future says it is a family-based party, and it has made a lot of noise about self-employed workers, so I am very confident of its support. I am sure the National Party will support such an amendment. I am very, very confident that when this bill has gone through the Committee stage it will come out providing for paid parental leave for self-employed people, and this Parliament will have achieved something that the Government members only dreamt about. New Zealand First will have fixed it.

πŸ—£οΈ Spoke in this debate (1)

  • Peter Brown (New Zealand First Party β€” List Member)

πŸ—³οΈ Votes in this debate (2)

βœ“ Passed
Question: That the amendments recommended by the Social Services Committee by majority be agreed to
βœ“ Passed
Question: That the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill be now read a second time
πŸ“‹ We've linked this vote to our "Extended paid parental leave" policy - our best judgment is that a vote for this is a vote for Extended paid parental leave.