πŸ§ͺ EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA β€” this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Tuesday, 25 August 2026

Social Security (Jobseeker Support and Accommodation Supplement) Amendment Bill

Committee of the whole House β€” Clauses 1 to 3
HansardID: ec5fbee0-b948-4a63-f663-abb21b5e003b
πŸ—³οΈ 4 votes β€” jump to votes section
Back to debates
✏️ Hansard still marked this day's transcript "Draft" as of our last import - it may since have been corrected or finalised upstream. Check the official transcript if anything here looks off.
πŸ—£οΈ Speech Dr Lawrence Xu-Nan (Green Party of Aotearoa / New Zealand β€” List Member)
8:19 PM
Committee of the whole House

Thank you, Mr Chair. I would like to start with clause 2 on commencement. Now, I understand clause 2(2) coming into force 1 April, start of the financial year. That makes sense. I am curious as to the date for clause 1, because 2 November, however, is a very odd date to start a particular piece of legislation. So would the Minister for Social Development and Employment please elucidate on why the Act comes into force on 2 November 2026. That’s my first question to the Minister.

πŸ—£οΈ Speech Dr Lawrence Xu-Nan (Green Party of Aotearoa / New Zealand β€” List Member)
8:20 PM
Committee of the whole House

I also want to check in terms ofβ€”thank you, Minister, by the way. That does make sense. I do want to check with the Minister for Social Development and Employment on the title of this particular bill on whether β€œ(Jobseeker Support and Accommodation Supplement)” actually does reflect what this bill does, because I think, in some ways, it’s not simply the accommodation supplement. The changes that we’re seeing to the jobseeker is not simply to the jobseeker support itself, but in terms of the parental income requirement. So I just wanted to check with the Minister that in that particular title the parental income requirement, which is a substantial part of this bill, has not been added into the title of the bill, which would potentially lead to some confusion, because, for example, it’s not simply granting jobseeker support. We could say, β€œ(Jobseeker Support Alteration and Accommodation Supplement)” or β€œ(Jobseeker Support and Accommodation Supplement Alteration) Amendment Bill”. So I just want to seek the Minister’s clarification that neither of those two things really reflect what we’re seeing here in this bill.

πŸ—£οΈ Spoke in this debate (1)

πŸ—³οΈ Votes in this debate (4)

βœ“ Passed
Question: That debate on this question now close
βœ“ Passed
Question: That clause 1 be agreed to
βœ“ Passed
Question: That clause 2 be agreed to
βœ“ Passed
Question: That clause 3 be agreed to