🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Tuesday, 25 August 2026

Serious Fraud Office Amendment Bill

Committee of the whole House — Part 2 Amendments to other enactments, and Schedule 2
HansardID: 1091d236-df4c-6a08-94d5-028dd3ffc8eb
Back to debates
✏️ Hansard still marked this day's transcript "Draft" as of our last import - it may since have been corrected or finalised upstream. Check the official transcript if anything here looks off.
🗣️ Speech Dr Duncan Webb (New Zealand Labour Party — Member for Christchurch Central)
Time unknown
Committee of the whole House

Thank you. I do have a question regarding Schedule 2 and this is specifically clause 13, “form 4 set out in Schedule 2”. I guess the first question is: is it the standard rule that the form that you’re looking at for search warrant is locked into primary legislation? I’m guessing any adjustments to this form needs to be done through primary legislation; there are no regulations around this. That being my first question.

I just want to double-check that in this particular form—in 3(a) I believe—that (3)(a) is sufficient to actually capture all of the information that we’ve discussed previously. For example, linked accounts, apps, and all of those?

🗣️ Speech Dr Lawrence Xu-Nan (Green Party of Aotearoa / New Zealand — List Member)
Time unknown
Committee of the whole House

Yes. The answer is yes to both. Yes, to both, Lawrence Xu-Nan.

Part 2 agreed to.

Schedule 1 agreed to.

Schedule 2 agreed to.

Committee of the whole House

Clauses 1 and 2

CHAIRPERSON (Barbara Kuriger): Members, we come now to our final debate, clauses 1 and 2. This is the debate on “Title” and “Commencement”.

🗣️ Speech Hon Mark Mitchell (New Zealand National Party — Member for Whangaparāoa)
Time unknown
Committee of the whole House
⚠️ Debate item not imported yet

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (3)