Fast-track Approvals Bill
The question is that the Minister’s tabled amendments to the amendments to Schedule 5 set out on Amendment Paper 238 be agreed to.
The question is that the Minister’s amendments to Schedule 5 set out on Amendment Paper 238 be agreed to.
The Hon Rachel Brooking’s amendment to clause 17D in Schedule 5 set out on Amendment Paper 137 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the committee.
The question is that the Hon Rachel Brooking’s remaining amendments to Schedule 5 set out on Amendment Paper 137 be agreed to.
Lan Pham’s amendments to Schedule 5 set out on Amendment Paper 209 are out of order as being the same as a previous amendment.
The Hon Priyanca Radhakrishnan’s amendments to clause 5(1) of Schedule 5 set out on Amendment Paper 143 are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the committee.
Lan Pham’s amendment to delete Part 3 of Schedule 5 set out on Amendment Paper 162 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the committee.
Lan Pham’s amendment to clause 17A of Schedule 5 set out on Amendment Paper 211 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the committee.
Lan Pham’s amendment to replace clause 17D(2) of Schedule 5 set out on Amendment Paper 212 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the committee.
🗣️ Spoke in this debate (1)
- Greg O'Connor (New Zealand Labour Party — Member for Ōhāriu)