🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Thursday, 21 October 2021

Speaker’s Rulings — Interpretation of “Business Attire”

HansardID: de712c88-b269-438e-bc40-a264ccb689b2
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech David Seymour (ACT New Zealand — Member for Epsom)
Time unknown

Point of order, Mr Speaker. I seek your assistance in interpreting a Speaker’s ruling 17/7. I know you may not be used to being asked for sartorial advice, but are Air Jordans an example of business attire?

🗣️ Speech Sir Rt Hon Trevor Mallard (New Zealand Labour Party — List Member)
Time unknown

Well, I’d tend to say it would depend on the business you were in. The business which Air Jordans are normally associated with, in my interpretation, is not quite the business that we expect to take part in these precincts. I am, however, taking a lot of care around further interpretation of sartorial elegance and business attire in the House. I think it is a case of twice burnt, I’m not going to do it again.

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (2)