🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

Points of Order — Members—Appropriate Attire

HansardID: be2b7f73-618d-4a73-b277-1d3ca185df8a
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech Jami-Lee Ross (New Zealand National Party — Member for Botany)
Time unknown

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I have waited until as near to the end of the House as possible, without interrupting anyone. Some of us on this side are a little offended by the lowering of dress standards by a member in the House and I wonder whether you could refer to Speaker’s ruling 16/2, the requirement for members to dress in business attire, and 16/4, around the wearing of hats. [Interruption]

🗣️ Speech Lindsay Tisch (New Zealand National Party — Member for Waikato)
Time unknown

Order! A point of order has been raised. If we look at Speaker’s ruling 16/4 there is no rule prohibiting a member wearing a hat. It goes on to say—I will just go to the last part—“But in the normal wearing of attire a member is perfectly entitled to wear a hat.” That was Chairperson Braybrooke in 1999. [Interruption] Order! I am upholding the ruling that appears in Speakers’ Rulings.

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (2)

  • Jami-Lee Ross (New Zealand National Party — Member for Botany)
  • Lindsay Tisch (New Zealand National Party — Member for Waikato)