🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Thursday, 28 March 2013

Personal Explanations — Tabling of Documents—Accuracy of Description of Documents

HansardID: 80a96c3f-9516-45d5-aa3b-ea72ca4e8d93
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech Lianne Dalziel (New Zealand Labour Party — Member for Christchurch East)
Time unknown

I seek leave to make a personal explanation in respect of the description of the documents that I referred to in the House during the urgent question.

The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (H V Ross Robertson): Thank you. The member has been quite clear. Is there any objection to that course of action being taken? There is none. The member may make a personal explanation.

When I referred in the House at question time to the transactions report that had been received with over 2,000 names on it, I referred to it as containing bank account numbers as well. The person who sent it to me said that it had names and bank account details. The bank names were on each of the different pages and so I just assumed that that was what they were. On closer examination, they are probably cheque numbers. I just wanted to confirm on the record of the House that that was my understanding at the time. I did not want anyone to be left with the impression that it was not correct. [Interruption]

The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (H V Ross Robertson): Order! When there is a point of order—sorry.

It is fine.

The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (H V Ross Robertson): You are fine? Good.

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (1)

  • Lianne Dalziel (New Zealand Labour Party — Member for Christchurch East)