🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Wednesday, 20 February 2013

Voting — Tasman District Council (Validation and Recovery of Certain Rates) Bill—Mana Party Votes

HansardID: 35b1676c-3fa5-444c-ad1b-2d62cb1b2b7b
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech Hon Eugenie Sage (Green Party of Aotearoa / New Zealand — List Member)
Time unknown

My apologies, Mr Speaker. I seek leave to have it recorded in the Journals of the House that the Mana Party wished to vote in the negative on the Tasman District Council (Validation and Recovery of Certain Rates) Bill, which the House was previously dealing with.

💬 Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: You were tasked with that responsibility?

Yes, and I did not carry that out.

🗣️ Speech Eric Roy (New Zealand National Party — Member for Invercargill)
Time unknown

Leave is sought that it might be recorded in the Journals that the Mana Party wished to vote. We are not changing the vote. Leave is sought for that purpose. Is there anyone opposed to that course of action? There appears not. Leave is granted.

🗣️ Speech Hon Michael Woodhouse (New Zealand National Party — List Member)
Time unknown

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I just want to clarify through the Green Party member—the way I heard it described, and you accurately and faithfully recorded it, I think the intention was that the Hansard be adjusted, which is possible with the leave of the House. I just wanted to check—

🗣️ Speech Eric Roy (New Zealand National Party — Member for Invercargill)
Time unknown

Let me try to help the member, because it is a little unusual what we have had happen. I think the member asked that the Journals record that it was the intention of the Mana Party to vote against it, not to change the vote, because the vote had taken place. We cannot actually do that. So that is all that will be recorded in Hansard. Right? Is everybody clear?

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (3)