🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Thursday, 4 August 2011

Speaker’s Rulings — Committee of the Whole House—Motions to Report Progress

HansardID: 3d5575df-3e74-4d40-8126-f41bc6cd683e
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech Lockwood Smith (New Zealand National Party — Member for Rodney)
Time unknown

Yesterday the Committee sought my ruling on the moving of motions to report progress, a motion to do just that having been defeated by the Committee of the whole House on the Education (Freedom of Association) Amendment Bill.

The House has a fundamental principle that having once dealt with a matter, it refrains from raising it again. Standing Order 260 establishes this principle as a rule for bills, amendments, or instructions proposed that are substantially the same in effect as ones that have already been agreed to or defeated. Clearly, where a Committee has defeated a motion to report progress and another motion to report progress is moved immediately thereafter, it simply raises again the matter the Committee has already resolved.

However, motions that progress be reported during the Committee stage do not always raise the same considerations. The rejection of such a motion in one circumstance does not presuppose that it may be similarly rejected in a new Committee on a different day, or during the consideration of a different provision of the bill.

Therefore, a motion to report progress moved pursuant to Standing Order 177(1) having been defeated by the Committee, a further motion to report progress may not be moved while the procedural circumstances remain unchanged—in other words, while that Committee continues to consider the same substantive question proposed by the Chair.

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (1)