🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Tuesday, 16 November 2010

Urgent Debates Declined — Pansy Wong—Ministerial Resignation

HansardID: ea393ff9-6027-4396-b5b5-bf375a530d3d
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech Lockwood Smith (New Zealand National Party — Member for Rodney)
Time unknown

I have received a letter from the Hon Pete Hodgson seeking to debate under Standing Order 380 the resignation of the Minister for Ethnic Affairs and the Minister of Women’s Affairs, the Hon Pansy Wong. This is a particular case of recent occurrence involving ministerial responsibility. Not all ministerial resignations will lead to an urgent debate. In this case I am not persuaded to accept the application. Although there is ministerial responsibility for the acceptance of a resignation of a Minister, the administrative responsibility in this case lies with the Speaker. The issues that led to Mrs Wong’s resignation are not ones to which ministerial responsibility attaches. Parliamentary travel entitlements are funded through Vote Parliamentary Service and administered by the Parliamentary Service. It is the Speaker who must answer for them. Furthermore, there is a Parliamentary Service investigation under way. This needs to run its course. To justify an urgent debate, there must be an element of urgency to require a matter to be debated immediately; otherwise, the scope for urgent debates would be enormous. The urgent debate is a way of holding the Government accountable for an action for which it is responsible. It is not a vehicle for addressing matters that are the responsibility of the Speaker. The application is therefore declined.

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (1)