🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Wednesday, 15 September 2010

Personal Explanations — Passport Fraud—Discharge Without Conviction

HansardID: ba6fa890-4cb8-4032-9c29-6ab99675401c
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech David Garrett (ACT New Zealand — List Member)
Time unknown

I seek leave of the House to make a personal explanation regarding speculation about me in the media.

💬 Mr SPEAKER: Leave is sought for a personal explanation. Is there any objection? There is no objection.

Twenty-six years ago, while living a very different life, I foolishly undertook what I naively saw as a harmless prank. It was one that was to later have repercussions, both for me personally and for others who did not deserve to be hurt by my thoughtless actions. Using a method made known by the publication of the novel The Day of the Jackal I obtained the birth certificate of a child born at around the time I was born, but who had died in infancy. I used this birth certificate to obtain a passport in that child’s name. To this day I cannot explain the rationale behind my actions, except to say I was simply curious to see whether such a thing could be done. I never used the passport for any purpose. It duly expired, never having been used, and I later destroyed it.

Twenty-one years after I obtained the passport, and many years after it had expired, I was arrested, along with a number of others, following a police inquiry into passports that had been wrongfully obtained. This inquiry followed the obtaining by Israelis who were believed to be connected to that country’s intelligence service of a number of passports, using the same method I had used. I was duly put before the court and admitted obtaining a passport by false pretences. After submissions by my lawyer, I was discharged without conviction. The court accepted that the consequences of a conviction for this offence would have consequences out of all proportion to the offending.

I was also granted permanent name suppression. My reluctance to answer media questions was due to my uncertainty regarding the extent of coverage of the suppression order. My preliminary legal advice is that for this reason, neither I nor anyone else may comment further on this matter outside the House at this time. I am now seeking advice on whether the name suppression order can be varied or waived so that I may take media questions.

I have made many mistakes in my life, none more so than this. At the time when I committed this offence, I gave no thought whatsoever to the effect it would have on others. Following my arrest, I wrote letters of apology to the child’s relatives, expressing my sincere remorse for the pain I had caused them. The regret I feel at the hurt that I unwittingly caused the family of the deceased child is something I carry with me today and will continue to carry for the rest of my life. I cannot wind back the clock, but I sincerely wish that I could. Thank you.

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (1)