Lawyers and Conveyancers Bill
I seek leave that all the amendments set out on Dr Worthβs Supplementary Order Paper 344 relating to the schedules be taken as one question.
The CHAIRPERSON (Ann Hartley): Leave is sought for that. Is there any objection? There is not. The amendments to schedules 1, 2, and 4 are out of order, as they are inconsistent with a previous decision.
The question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 344 in the name of Dr Richard Worth to schedule 6 be agreed to.
Amendments not agreed to.
The question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 10 in the name of the Hon Mark Burton to the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 324 in the name of the Hon Phil Goff to schedule 6 be agreed to.
Amendment to the amendment agreed to.
The question was put that the amendment as amended set out on Supplementary Order Paper 324 in the name of the Hon Phil Goff to schedule 6, the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 324 in his name to schedules 5 and 7, and the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 10 in the name of the Hon Mark Burton to schedules 2 and 6 be agreed to.
Amendment as amended and amendments agreed to.
Schedules 1 to 7 as amended agreed to.
Clauses 1 and 2
The question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 344 in the name of Dr Richard Worth to clause 1 be agreed to.
Amendment not agreed to.
Clause 1 agreed to.
Clause 2 agreed to.
Bill reported with amendment.
Report adopted.
The House adjourned at 9.56 p.m.
π£οΈ Spoke in this debate (1)
- Lindsay Tisch (New Zealand National Party β Member for Piako)