🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Tuesday, 29 March 2005

Urgent Debates Declined — Tertiary Education Savings Scheme—Government Policy

HansardID: 5c663648-342e-4812-92fb-a9015c3046a3
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech Margaret Wilson (New Zealand Labour Party — List Member)
Time unknown

I have received a letter from the Hon Peter Dunne seeking to debate a decision not to establish a scheme to assist parents to save for their children’s tertiary education. The application relates to a newspaper report that a scheme that was to have formed part of the next Budget is not to go ahead. Had such a scheme been announced in the Budget it would, at that point of course, have been a particular case of recent occurrence within the terms of Standing Order 373. But a Government deciding not to initiate a new policy, if that is indeed the case, is not a particular case of recent occurrence that can be raised for debate under the Standing Orders. The application is therefore declined.

🗣️ Speech Sir Rt Hon Trevor Mallard (New Zealand Labour Party — Member for Hutt South)
Time unknown

I raise a point of order, Madam Speaker. I just make it clear that the report on which the member relies was grossly inaccurate.

🗣️ Speech Richard Prebble (ACT New Zealand — List Member)
Time unknown

I raise a point of order, Madam Speaker. Like the rest of the House, I am obliged to the Minister, but if he is going to make that much of a statement, why does he not make a ministerial statement and tell us what the real situation is? I am sure the whole House is just waiting to hear.

🗣️ Speech Margaret Wilson (New Zealand Labour Party — List Member)
Time unknown

I thank the member, but that is not a point of order.

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (3)