🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Tuesday, 16 November 2004

Foreshore and Seabed Bill

Procedure
HansardID: 6781a06a-7393-4d3e-9150-b684192dccf3
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech Hon Sir Michael Cullen (New Zealand Labour Party — List Member)
Time unknown

Pursuant to our discussion in the Business Committee I seek leave for there to be 14 speeches, each of a maximum of 10 minutes, on the second and third reading debates on the Foreshore and Seabed Bill.

💬 Mr SPEAKER: Is there any objection to that course being followed? There appears to be none. That will be so.

🗣️ Speech Hon Sir Michael Cullen (New Zealand Labour Party — List Member)
Time unknown

Secondly, I seek leave to table a document that shows the effects that the amendments proposed in Supplementary Order Paper 302 would have on the text of the Foreshore and Seabed Bill as introduced. The document, of course, has no official status. It is provided solely for the convenience of members of Parliament.

Document, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.

🗣️ Speech Ken Shirley (ACT New Zealand — List Member)
Time unknown

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. Seeing as this is quite an extraordinary situation we have here with, effectively, a new bill just tabled and available for Opposition members, perhaps the Deputy Prime Minister could have unlimited time—with the first Opposition spokesperson having equivalent unlimited time—so that he can go through and explain the changes and the detail, given that the select committee could not give a full report back to the House, and that we will move into the Committee stage on this very important bill without having done it justice at the second reading.

💬 Mr SPEAKER: Leave is sought that the first two speeches have unlimited time. Is there any objection? There is objection.

Second Reading

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (2)