🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Tuesday, 23 March 2004

Motions — Black Caps—Test Win Over South Africa

HansardID: 4acc4181-bf03-4c9c-8865-026796b6d9fd
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech Peter Dunne (United Future New Zealand — Member for Ohariu-Belmont)
Time unknown

I move, That this House congratulate the Black Caps on its historic nine-wicket second test win over South Africa on Monday, and, further, that this House congratulate Chris Cairns in particular on his achievement in making it into the 3,000-run, 200-wicket club during the same match.

🗣️ Speech Sir Rt Hon Trevor Mallard (New Zealand Labour Party — Member for Hutt South)
Time unknown

On behalf of the Labour Party and the Government I wish to endorse the comments that the Hon Peter Dunne has made. This is a historic victory. It is one that you, Mr Speaker, have been waiting for for a very long time, and I know you will make sure that this message is personally passed on to the Black Caps over the next few days.

💬 Mr SPEAKER: On Friday morning!

🗣️ Speech Don Brash (New Zealand National Party — List Member)
Time unknown

I would like to add the congratulations of the National Party to both the Black Caps and Chris Cairns. I think Chris Cairns is only the sixth cricketer in test history to achieve 3,000 runs and 200 wickets in test cricket. I cannot resist pointing out to the Minister of Finance that the two New Zealanders who make up the six both came from the same very good Christchurch school.

🗣️ Speech Rt Hon Winston Peters (New Zealand First Party — Member for Tauranga)
Time unknown

I was not going to add my voice to this motion, but I have to correct the previous speaker; it was 3,000 runs, not 2,000—[Interruption] I think it is very important. I do endorse the comments of the Hon Peter Dunne, but I do wish that members of Parliament would leave it to just one person—the one who thought of it—to move such a motion rather than all rising to try to get some vicarious benefit.

Motion agreed to.

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (4)