Speaker’s Rulings — Matter Awaiting Adjudication

I wish to refer to a matter that was raised by Mr Brownlee yesterday. Mr Brownlee raised a point of order relating to a question that was returned to him because it referred to a case pending adjudication before a court. He asked for advice on how he could approach the matter he wishes to ask a question about. I do not understand Mr Brownlee to be challenging the applicability of the sub judice Standing Orders in this case. I do not accept the argument that it is anomalous that the news media can discuss something that is not open to members to raise. The fact is that Parliament sets higher standards for itself than does the news media. With regard to matters awaiting adjudication, these standards have regard to the constitutional relationship between Parliament and the courts—see Speaker’s ruling 6/2 (Supplement).

When the question was returned to Mr Brownlee, it was indicated that there were alternative ways of seeking the information sought. I suggest that the member explore those further—I obviously cannot redraft his question on the floor of the House—and I am sure that a satisfactory question can be crafted.