πŸ§ͺ EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA β€” this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Tuesday, 21 October 2003

Retirement Villages Bill

In Committee
HansardID: 4ae2b543-c354-4081-88c4-cbb47c6a08be
Back to debates
πŸ—£οΈ Speech John Carter (New Zealand National Party β€” Member for Northland)
Time unknown

I have not had a chance to discuss this matter with the other parties at all and they may well object. However, while I know that some parties have different issues, and one or two are not in support of the bill, I wonder whether it would be helpful to the Committee to have just one wide-ranging debate in the Committee stage, and I seek leave accordingly. If parties do not agree, obviously they can oppose it. However, I seek leave.

πŸ—£οΈ Speech Deborah Coddington (ACT New Zealand β€” List Member)
Time unknown

I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I could not hear what the member said. Could he please repeat that.

πŸ—£οΈ Speech John Carter (New Zealand National Party β€” Member for Northland)
Time unknown

I sought leave to have one wide-ranging debate in the Committee stage for a considerable length of time so that we can debate the issues and pick them up as we want to, rather than have a part-by-part debate. As I said, I have not had a chance to discuss it with any other parties. If the member objects, then obviously it will not happen, and we will debate the bill part by part.

πŸ—£οΈ Speech The CHAIRPERSON (Hon Clem Simich)
Time unknown

Leave has been sought. Is there any objection to that course? There appears to be none.

Clauses 1 to 78, and schedules

πŸ—£οΈ Spoke in this debate (2)