Copyright (Parallel Importation of Films and Onus of Proof) Amendment Bill
Mr Speaker, some concern has been expressed that Opposition members were not given their right to speak in the second reading debate. As a result there has been a long debate in the Committee that has necessitated your recall.
I think I had better state the facts as they are, because I have had an opportunity to listen to the tape. The tape shows quite clearly that when Judith Tizard sat down Mr Carter moved that the House adjourn at that stage, and no one was called. That is what the tape shows. If members look at the Order Paper they will see that it states: “11 x 10m speeches remain.” When I called the second reading I was waiting for the first person to get up to take a call. No one did, and I put the question. I am obliged to do that. No one sought the call. There is no clerical error whatsoever on behalf of the Clerk’s Office. We have listened to the tape.
In accepting that advice to the Parliament, and in view of, perhaps, getting some movement on this—because otherwise we may end up with some frustration—I wonder whether it would be sensible if I were to seek leave of the House for us to get agreement to recommence the second reading, so that members who want to make a contribution to a second reading might do so. Following that, we could then go back into Committee. I seek leave of the House for us to resume the second reading.
💬 Mr SPEAKER: No, leave has to be sought to rescind the motion.
I seek leave to rescind the motion.
💬 Mr SPEAKER: Leave is sought to do that. Is there any objection? There appears to be objection.
In Committee
Debate resumed.
Clause 1 Title
🗣️ Spoke in this debate (1)
- John Carter (New Zealand National Party — Member for Northland)