Voting β Correction
I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I seek leave to alter three United Future votes that were taken in the Committee of the whole House yesterday on the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Compensation Amendment Bill.
π¬ Mr SPEAKER: Leave is sought to adjust votes from the Committee of the whole House. In actual fact, I think it makes little difference to the outcome. It is just that one vote was cast for the Ayes and should have been cast for the Noes. Is there any objection to that? Please read the three out.
On the question that Part 2 stand part, United Future voted for the Ayes. The vote should have been for the Noes. The result was announced as: Ayes 69, Noes 47. The result would now be: Ayes 61, Noes 55. On the question that Part 3 stand part, United Future voted for the Ayes. The vote should have been for the Noes. The result was announced as: Ayes 69, Noes 44. The result would now be: Ayes 61, Noes 52. On the question that the schedule stand part, United Future voted for the Ayes. The vote should have been for the Noes. The result was announced as: Ayes 69, Noes 44. The result would now be: Ayes 61, Noes 52. I would like to apologise to the House for the inconvenience.
π¬ Mr SPEAKER: The Journals will be adjusted accordingly. Is there any objection to the question of leave? There is not.
π£οΈ Spoke in this debate (1)
- Gordon Copeland (United Future New Zealand β List Member)