🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Wednesday, 7 May 2003

Points of Order — Minister's Comments

HansardID: 519faafe-47fd-47c6-b681-9f987ebf4a1f
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech Rodney Hide (ACT New Zealand — List Member)
Time unknown

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I raise a very serious concern for the House. We have had a senior Minister of this Government give an answer in Parliament that has gone around the world, and then we have had a situation where the Government of another country, which is a parliamentary democracy, has been reported in that country as saying that there is no truth in the statement that the Minister has made. So I am in a quandary, because it seems to me that we cannot—

🗣️ Speech Mr SPEAKER
Time unknown

Would the member tell me what the point of order is? This is a point of order.

💬 RODNEY HIDE: Well, answers have to be truthful. We have had a Minister give an answer about another Government. That Government has said that is totally untrue—

🗣️ Speech Mr SPEAKER
Time unknown

Please be seated. The member knows that if there is any matter like that, it then becomes a matter about which the member should be writing to me on a question of privilege. I suggest to the member that that is where we go.

💬 Rodney Hide: Point of order.

🗣️ Speech Mr SPEAKER
Time unknown

I have made my ruling.

🗣️ Speech Rodney Hide (ACT New Zealand — List Member)
Time unknown

I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I know you have made your ruling. I made a decision not to raise it with you as a breach of privilege. If I had done that, I would have had it to you by 2 o’clock. My difficulty is that I do not see how we can bring a foreign Government into an issue on a breach of privilege. To make it clear, it concerns a statement—

🗣️ Speech Mr SPEAKER
Time unknown

That is not a point of order, and that makes no difference to the issue. Please be seated.

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (1)