πŸ§ͺ EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA β€” this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Tuesday, 18 February 2003

Local Government Law Reform Bill (No 2)

Instruction to Local Government and Environment Committee
HansardID: c1718517-c14a-461d-8df5-82a9b7dfab9d
Back to debates
πŸ—£οΈ Speech Hon Sir Michael Cullen (New Zealand Labour Party β€” List Member)
Time unknown

I seek leave that the Local Government and Environment Committee in its consideration of the Local Government Law Reform Bill (No 2) have power to consider and, if it thinks fit, adopt any amendments relating to the control and care of dogs.

πŸ’¬ Mr SPEAKER: Leave is sought for that purpose. Is there any disagreement? There is not.

πŸ—£οΈ Speech John Carter (New Zealand National Party β€” Member for Northland)
Time unknown

I have listened carefully to the explanation given by the Minister with regard to this bill being referred to the Local Government and Environment Committee. I understand that he did not seek leave for it to go to the Government Administration Committee because one of the parties would not support the leave. I think it would be useful if the bill were referred to the Government Administration Committee rather than the Local Government and Environment Committee. Given that we have just passed a motion, I nevertheless seek the leave that the Local Government Law Reform Bill (No 2), be referred to the Government Administration Committee. I seek the leave of the House for that to happen.

πŸ’¬ Mr SPEAKER: I presume that means with the proviso that every party be represented on the committee, as explained by the Hon Dr Michael Cullen.

Yes.

πŸ’¬ Mr SPEAKER: I have to seek the leave of the House to revoke the previous motion, which was passed unanimously. Is there leave to put the question again? Does anyone object? There is objection. The original motion stands referred.

πŸ—£οΈ Spoke in this debate (2)