🧪 EXPERIMENTAL / ALPHA — this is an independent prototype, not an official record. Data may be incomplete or wrong - always check the linked Hansard source before relying on it.
Hot Air

Tuesday, 25 August 2026

Serious Fraud Office Amendment Bill

Committee of the whole House — Part 2 Amendments to other enactments, and Schedule 2
HansardID: 23a606c8-14c2-4635-f957-868d9b6a7c76
Back to debates
🗣️ Speech Dr Duncan Webb (Labour Party — Member for Christchurch Central)
11:30 PM
Committee of the whole House

Oh no, it was Schedule 1 I wanted to talk about actually. I’ll leave that.

🗣️ Speech Dr Lawrence Xu-Nan (Green Party — List Member)
11:30 PM
Committee of the whole House

Thank you. I do have a question regarding Schedule 2 and this is specifically clause 13, “form 4 set out in Schedule 2”. I guess the first question is: is it the standard rule that the form that you’re looking at for search warrant is locked into primary legislation? I’m guessing any adjustments to this form needs to be done through primary legislation; there are no regulations around this. That being my first question.

I just want to double-check that in this particular form—in 3(a) I believe—that (3)(a) is sufficient to actually capture all of the information that we’ve discussed previously. For example, linked accounts, apps, and all of those?

🗣️ Speech Hon Mark Mitchell (National Party — Member for Whangaparāoa)
11:31 PM
Committee of the whole House

Yes. The answer is yes to both. Yes, to both, Lawrence Xu-Nan.

Part 2 agreed to.

Schedule 1 agreed to.

Schedule 2 agreed to.

Committee of the whole House

Clauses 1 and 2

CHAIRPERSON (Barbara Kuriger): Members, we come now to our final debate, clauses 1 and 2. This is the debate on “Title” and “Commencement”.

🗣️ Spoke in this debate (3)